From: michaelflynt@delphi.com (Michael Flynt)
Newsgroups: alt.paranet.ufo
Subject: Re: GROOM LAKE SCANDAL  L
Message-ID: <Js8r-0o.michaelflynt@delphi.com>
Date: 2 Mar 94 12:02:00 GMT
Organization: Delphi (info@delphi.com email, 800-695-4005 voice)

Jim Shaffer <Jim.Shaffer@p0.f939.n107.z1.FIDONET.ORG> writes:
 
>Lear and someone named John Grace are responsible for the Krill paper.  The
>sources they cite all exist, but the overall paper was composed as an attempt
>to catch Cooper in the act of plagiarizing information for his theories, which
>is what they suspected him of doing.  Their suspicions were correct.  Cooper
>later made reference to Krill as being a captured alien, when in fact the
>concept originated with the Krill paper.  These days, Cooper still talks
 
Okay, that explains this item I found on CIS named "KRILL.FAKE". I am
beginning to feal like a midevil scientist, where science is not what you do
but what you reference. This get confusing. Oh, here's that file in case
anybody wants it. I think it came from here originally, anyway.
_________________________________________________________________________
Here is KRILL.FAKE
 
      To:  Benjamin Rice              Message #:  2579     2113 <Thread
    From:  John Hicks                 Submitted:  05 Feb 92 20:36:00
 Subject:  Krill papers                  Status:  Public
Received:  No                             Group:  UFO (15)
 
MSGID: 1:363/29 121474d4
  Here's a canned message on Krill.....
 
(7245)  Thu 21 Mar 91 10:55p
By: Bill English
To: All
Re: Krill files
St:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
During the past several weeks there have been a number of questions concerning
the infamous "Krill Papers". At the advise of John Hicks (363/29) I am posting
this information concerning the documents in question.
 
1) The "Krill Papers" were and are a fraud. John Lear and John Grace of Nevada
authored these papers and uploaded them to a Paranet Board originally to see
just how guliable the UFO investigative community really was. Much to the
credit of Paranet and Mike Corbin, it was quickly determined that the documents
were in fact fraudulent. As a result of this both John Lear and John Grace were
barred from Paranet and several other UFO related Echos. While I don't agree
with the methods employed by John, I do understand his reasoning for this.
 
2) In one respect the fraud perpetrated by John Lear and John Grace had the
effect of proving that at least one so called researcher of of some renoun was
in fact a fraud himself. I am of course refering to William Cooper. John was
listening to Cooper give and interview to one of the local news media when he
over heard Cooper state that while serving in the Navy he in fact viewed the
Krill Papers. John approached and questioned Cooper about this knowing that the
Krill Papers and the information in them was faked. Cooper stuck to his story
and decided that John was his enemy. Especially after John pointed out to him
that the Krill Papers were faked. As a result of this Cooper went on a rampage
and did everything that he could to discredit Lear and several others.
 
3) For those of you just coming onto the UFO scene, it is imparitive that you
understand that one of the many problems that are inherent to UFO research
field is that information sometimes get spread out so quickly without proper
disemination. As a result of this it becomes factual without basis.
PLEASE...PLEASE...don't take everything you read on these databases as being
the absolute truth without first checking with others and most importantly
checking your sources...We all get burned from time to time...including myself
as evidenced by the SS433 fiasco. But we are the ones who some day may be
looked upon as the true heros of our time. At least I hope so..A lot of us have
lost so much because of what we do here...
 
Bill English
 
---
 * Origin: Moderation? What's that? -*- Fidonet UFO Moderator (1:363/29)
=-=-=-=-=
______________________________________________________________________________
Thanks, JS for your post. I was beginning to get a bit confused as to who is
stabbing who's back.  :)